The Tragedy of Music Hall

Mary Ellyn Hutton
Posted: Jan 11, 2010 - 3:07:32 PM in commentary

Re-posted from Feb. 23, 2009 (Commentary).

Has the cockroach that ate Cincinnati struck again?  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viTUhOT4d3I

On January 7, 2010, CSO music director Paavo Järvi announced that he will leave the orchestra at the end of the 2010-2011 season.  Did 132-year-old Music Hall, built for huge choral festivals like Cincinnati's May Festival, have anything to do with it?  Would Dr. Demento (video clip above) have had something to say?

music_Hall_exterior.jpg
Cincinnati Music Hall
Sunday afternoon’s (Feb. 22, 2009) Cincinnati Symphony concert featuring the May Festival Chorus with conductor/May Festival Chorus director Robert Porco on the podium gave this listener a renewed opportunity to ponder the tragedy of Music Hall.
   Having once had a season ticket in the gallery, topmost level of the huge hall, which seats 3,516 according to the official Cincinnati Arts Association web site, though with wheelchair ramps and other flexible arrangements usually seats about 100 less, I decided to try again.  Seats with a full view of the stage are also less expensive in the gallery than in other parts of the hall.
   It is beautiful in the gallery, with a breathtaking view of the great crystal chandelier, the painting of the Muses on the ceiling, the great, gilded proscenium arch and red velvet seats below.
music_hall_resplendent.jpg
View of Music Hall auditorium from the gallery

   The program itself invited an acoustical test, with a 30-piece orchestra performing selections from Handel’s “Water Music” and Ralph Vaughan Williams’ vast “A Sea Symphony,” with the 130-plus May Festival Chorus and an orchestra of 90.  Attendance was perhaps 1,000, with people scattered all over the hall.
   To begin with – and this is a given for most CSO concerts at Music Hall -- the performance was exemplary (review pending).  The acoustics from the center of the gallery were extremely rewarding.  You could hear reverbs from the walls -- enough to give the music a warm halo without excess.  This was true of both the large and small ensembles, and diction by the chorus and guest artists Kelley Nassief, soprano, and baritone Brett Polegato was remarkably clear and intelligible, despite the poetic imagery of Vaughan Williams’ text (by Walt Whitman).
   From an audience standpoint (though it varies in different parts of the hall) acoustics in Music Hall is not a problem.  The CSO players have concerns of their own, i.e. hearing each other to maximize ensemble precision.  This was addressed with more or less success in the late 1990s by moving the stage slightly forward, installing reflective surfaces above the orchestra and acoustical towers in the back.   
   Simply put, Music Hall is a big hall with fine acoustics.  Telarc loves to record there and, in fact, the company just won a Grammy for best surround sound album for the CSO’s 2008 Mussorgsky release.  (Unfortunately, CSO recording activities are now on indefinite hold for budgetary reasons.)
   It’s the “big” that is the tragedy for Music Hall.  It is by far the largest concert hall in the United States -- or anywhere else for that matter, even Beijing, China.  Though CSO concerts would routinely fill and often sell out halls in much larger cities (Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, Atlanta, for example) the perception from looking at the empty seats in Music Hall is that CSO concerts do not sell.  That is false and a tragedy.
   Compounding the problem for the CSO is the all-too-true notion that one need not subscribe, or even buy a ticket in advance, to get a good seat.
   A live concert is a visual as well as an aural experience.  Anyone who has attended a concert at Walt Disney Hall in Los Angeles or any of the newer concert halls in Europe, where audiences are drawn into the music simply by being closer to the musicians -- partially surrounding them in some cases -- has had their eyes and ears opened.  The view of the CSO from the Music Hall gallery, while lovely, is kind of like big screen TV without the close-ups.  It is certainly not intimate, and inter-action among the players and conductor, a vital aspect of CSO music director Paavo Järvi's great success with the orchestra, is virtually imperceptible without binoculars.  It isn’t much better from most other points in the hall, either.
   Another problem involves the “sanctity” of Music Hall.  Audience abandonment of Cincinnati Ballet’s “Nutcracker” since it re-located to the Aronoff Center in 2007 underlines that.  Do people come to see “Nutcracker” or Music Hall?  Music Hall is beautiful without doubt, and one can gaze to distraction at the chandelier (the view is particularly spectacular in the gallery).  But was Music Hall made for the CSO or the CSO for Music Hall (the answer is “no” to both questions)?
   Talk of making structural changes to Music Hall – “downsizing” it, building a smaller auditorium adjacent to it – has been met with horror by some people in the community who cannot bear to see this icon touched in any way (unaware, perhaps, that it has undergone many changes in its 131-year history).
   That Music Hall was unsuitable for CSO concerts was known from the beginning (the orchestra was founded in 1895).  Music Hall was built in 1878 to house song festivals involving hundreds of singers (today’s descendant is the May Festival).  Emery Auditorium (2,200 seats), now languishing empty and in disrepair on Walnut Street, was built for the CSO in 1911 when Leopold Stokowski was music director.  The orchestra performed there happily for 25 years, until Music Hall needed an anchor tenant for fear it might be destroyed.
   The ultimate tragedy of Music Hall – and by extension the CSO -- is that the economy may have the final say.  Until the current recession took hold (and signs are that it will only deepen), there was optimism that something would be done to give the symphony the venue it deserves and still honor Music Hall.   That, too, is on hold waiting further developments.
   The one bright spot in this dismal picture is that CSO attendance has actually increased this season, by 14 per cent.  Counter-intuitive though this may be and how long it will last remain to be seen (the CSO’s 2009-10 season will be announced March 8).

Comments

Owen Lee
23 Feb 2009, 04:06
Thanks for your thoughtful writing, as always. Music Hall certainly presents the CSO with several challenges, which you addressed very thoroughly.

I keep wanting the back wall of the orchestra shell to be put in line with the proscenium arch. This would mean building the stage further out into the orchestra level. This would remove at least a few hundred seats. Music Hall would be almost a perfect sized concert hall like this, about the size of Carnegie Hall.

If Music Hall had comfortable sized seats spaced out more comfortably, this would also reduce seating.

It wouldn't hurt to close off the deep overhang under the lower balcony on the orchestra level. This would also reduce seating.

I wish the place could be updated the way the Concertgebouw has--an old building given modern amenities. Music Hall is architecturally spectacular both inside and out. The sound is also very beautiful and honest, true to what my instrument sounds like. Speaking selfishly, Music Hall is very flattering to the bass, even more so than Carnegie Hall. Yes, ensemble can be a challenge, but ensemble is also a challenge in the Concertgebouw or any hall with healthy reverberance.

I think it's a big risk to build a new concert hall when Cincinnati already has a concert hall that sounds and looks beautiful. Look what happened with Philadelphia's Kimmel Center or San Francisco's Davies Hall or LA Music Center or Avery Fisher Hall or Houston's Jones Hall when they first opened. A new hall is certainly no guarantee of a good sounding hall, and what may look good on Opening Night can look very dated within a few years. (Think the interior of the Kennedy Center.)
Kyle Werner
23 Feb 2009, 13:02
Wow, great post, Mary. You really captured the issues well.

Interesting to hear Owen's thoughts about Music Hall renovations. I think these ideas sound great! The one big issue that is hard to fix is that of the "extreme" seats on the sides of the gallery. These are terrible seats in every way; they are uncomfortable, you have to turn sideways to look toward the stage, you can only see half of the stage, and the acoustics are less than ideal. I think the orchestra level seats under the overhang are actually way better than the extreme gallery seats. This is evidenced by the fact that almost no one sits in the extreme seats unless the hall is close to full.

I agree that the acoustics in Music Hall are already quite good for the audience. However, I know that the orchestra has to work very hard to achieve the sound that we hear. This has sometimes resulted in unnecessary strain on the musicians. In a smaller hall, we could enjoy the same sound quality and the musicians wouldn't have to work so hard to be heard.

As you said, the 'sanctity' of Music Hall is a sore issue in this city. For instance, the whole Nutcracker controversy demonstrated that some audience members are willing to boycott performances because of this issue of Music Hall vs. Aronoff. The other problem is that the Pops and Opera really can sell out Music Hall from time to time. That's why I wonder if it might be better to invest in the renovation of Emery Auditorium for the purpose of regular CSO concerts. (Especially since there are already some plans in place for this project. See here: http://www.emerycenterapts.com/emeryhistory.html

If the CSO played classical concerts at Emery, and Pops and Opera at Music Hall, this would give the audience a nice variety of experiences. It would also leave some free time in both halls for touring groups. According to the above website, a renovated Emery would be a desirable location for touring productions, which often skip Cincinnati for lack of an appropriate venue. On the other hand, Music Hall is not particularly desirable for these groups, so I'm not sure what could be done with the open time/space in Music Hall. On the other hand, if Emery was renovated, then the orchestra could play there while Music Hall is being renovated. This idea is probably impossible given the current economy; however it is an idea.

Interesting things to think about, for sure...
Mary Ellyn Hutton
23 Feb 2009, 19:41
Many thanks Owen and Kyle for your valuable comments. I can see Music Hall renovated, downsized, whatever, to optimize the CSO experience. I can also see Emery Auditorium resurrected. To do both would be fantastic. Cincinnati has resources. It has the potential leadership to get it done. Hardest to accomplish, it seems, is the realization that something MUST be done.
Scott Morgan
14 Sep 2009, 00:27
The size and the availability of seats are two of the things I most appreciate about Music Hall. I never know when I'm going to be in town, but I can go to the symphony or the opera and buy a ticket in the gallery on the night of the performance.
I rarely go to any concert in which I have to make an extra trip to the box office or worse, pay Ticket-master their "convenience" fees.

And if I buy tickets to the symphony or the opera online or over the phone, they too charge an extra fee.

In the town in which I live most of the time, I have never been to the symphony because the acoustics are terrible, the concert hall is a modern building made of concrete blocks, and it’s impossible to buy reasonably priced tickets close to the concert date.

That, and they are actually advertising a “pops” concert with Art Garfunkel.”
*Name:
Email:
Notify me about new comments on this page
Hide my email
*Text:
Security Image:

Visual CAPTCHA