Thanks for your thoughtful writing, as always. Music Hall certainly
presents the CSO with several challenges, which you addressed very
thoroughly.
I keep wanting the back wall of the orchestra shell to be put in line with
the proscenium arch. This would mean building the stage further out into
the orchestra level. This would remove at least a few hundred seats.
Music Hall would be almost a perfect sized concert hall like this, about
the size of Carnegie Hall.
If Music Hall had comfortable sized seats spaced out more comfortably, this
would also reduce seating.
It wouldn't hurt to close off the deep overhang under the lower balcony on
the orchestra level. This would also reduce seating.
I wish the place could be updated the way the Concertgebouw has--an old
building given modern amenities. Music Hall is architecturally spectacular
both inside and out. The sound is also very beautiful and honest, true to
what my instrument sounds like. Speaking selfishly, Music Hall is very
flattering to the bass, even more so than Carnegie Hall. Yes, ensemble can
be a challenge, but ensemble is also a challenge in the Concertgebouw or
any hall with healthy reverberance.
I think it's a big risk to build a new concert hall when Cincinnati already
has a concert hall that sounds and looks beautiful. Look what happened
with Philadelphia's Kimmel Center or San Francisco's Davies Hall or LA
Music Center or Avery Fisher Hall or Houston's Jones Hall when they first
opened. A new hall is certainly no guarantee of a good sounding hall, and
what may look good on Opening Night can look very dated within a few years.
(Think the interior of the Kennedy Center.)